Warning: getimagesize(3076): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/vhosts/martijnstadhouders.com/httpdocs/wp-content/themes/travis/header-grid.php on line 60
Saas Agreement Legal Issues

For many companies, this difference between “traditional” software and saaS is, at least at first glance, almost perfect. However, using a SaaS platform via a traditional software model adds several new levels of risk that SaaS providers and their customers should be aware of. Parties to a SaaS transaction may attempt to reduce these problems and risks by reaching an agreement between them regarding the delivery of SaaS. In some cases, the conditions under which a SaaS provider provides its services are defined in a “Click-Through” document that a user agrees to before accessing the technology. In these cases, and unless the customer has some leverage, there is usually little or no negotiation on the terms that are often unilateral in favour of the supplier. However, in other cases, such as the . B, which involve tightly-adapted platforms, at the enterprise level or in a more complex way, the bargaining power between the parties is generally more balanced and the conditions under which a SaaS provider provides its services are often defined in a separate or similar SaaS agreement. In this area, some key areas of the SaaS terms can and often need to be the subject of strong negotiations. Some of these problems are described below. When negotiating your SaaS agreements, note a few other important elements: if subscribers are able to create user-generated content (UGC) for third-party users, UCG`s intellectual property must be taken into account. The app holder must be able to remove this content immediately due to possible liability as a publisher under Australian law. If the UGC is in favour of using third-party users, the agreement must contain some kind of license. You will find another discussion on this subject under “ACCC Guidance for Online User Reviews” by Dundas Lawyers.

4. Conversion and transition of data. When customer data is imported into the SaaS, parties must verify whether customer data can be imported directly from Legacy systems. If this is not the case, the SaaS agreement should look at data conversion, including the liability of each party for related costs. The agreement could also cover the supplier`s obligations (if any) in the event of data termination, such as the obligation to return or destroy. When the data needs to be returned, the agreement should also indicate the format in which it is provided. There are a few important points on which anyone involved in a SaaS agreement should pay attention, especially when it comes to pricing and service level: there are also legal issues that can be avoided or mitigated by the use of SaaS instead of a licensing agreement. One of the advantages of SaaS is the alleged tax evasion that would otherwise apply to royalties, but this benefit requires further consideration. Although royalties are generally taxable, the idea that saaS income will never be taxable is wrong and depends on the jurisdiction in which the services are offered. SaaS may be subject to different impositions in the different legal systems in which it is available, even if these jurisdictions are located within the same country. For example, according to the information currently available, there are many jurisdictions in the United States that apply VAT on SaaS (such as California, Illinois and New Jersey), as well as others that do not collect these taxes (such as Texas, Washington and New York).

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.